Thursday, November 28, 2019

Measurement B enchmarks and S cales used for H ypo Essays - Safety

Measurement B enchmarks and S cales used for H ypothesis T esting The possible measurement benchmark and scales used for workplace safety would be the pencil-paper, internet way of collection data. This research subject uses a survey method to collect data by pencil or paper or internet to see if measurement equivalences exist. The survey will include question s that all companies could use the data to form workplace safety training programs . The data that is collected will show that merging data obtained by the internet and paper-and-pencil is a legitimate way of collection of data. This measurement benchmark and scale would provide useful to organizations that are using surveys to collect data to help with future plans of the company. Surveys are a good way to collect data from the employees about what they actually know about workplace safety. The data that is gathered from the measurement benchmarks and scales will provide enough information to make a training program for workplace safety. In turn the information will continue to provide future improvements for the program. sampling Plans Observation I will be using observation because it is a useful tool to gather information on workplace safety. It is a way for me to " check for nonverbal expression of feelings, determine who interacts with whom, grasp how participants communicate with each other, and check for how much time is spent on various activities " (SCHMUCK, 1997). I will also observe how well the employees know the safety rules and regulations, and if they know how to work safely. Observation will give me an understanding on the lack of knowledge on workplace, and it is the right way to collect data for my study. Observation will also help in coming up with research questions. Focus Groups I think I will also use focus groups as a way to gather more information that can also be used in my research on workplace safety. Having a group leader conduct the meeting to collect data on subject at hand can also help by answering research question with data gathered. This method is also helpful to gather data when observation becomes difficult. This method can also gather large amounts of data in a short time. An advantage to using focus groups is that the researcher will get the data they need because it targets my direct subject of workplace safety. Interviews I also plan to use interviews because they can provide me with a deeper understanding of how well individuals know about workplace safety. Interviews are an appropriate way for me to gather data on my research. The interview will be one-on-one with each employee, and if employee is not at work the interview can be conducted by phone. Surveys I plan to use paper surveys to gather data that is not available from other sources. Using survey data compliments current data from secondary sources. Surveys that I use will also be anonymous so that employees will feel free to be more honest. The information needed to make the workplace program is truly based on honest answers so yes I will be using surveys to gather data needed for this research. Not only will surveys help gathering data to help develop a workplace safety program, but it will help in continuing to improve that program. Questions The question s I will ask in the interview, survey, and focus groups are as follows: Do you know what the hazards are in your job? Do you have all the information about what hazard types included with your job? Are their safety meeting held on a regular basis? Have you been trained for emergency procedures? If there is safety equipment have you been trained to use it? Do you know where fire extinguishers are and are you trained to use them? Do you know where the first aid stations are? Have you been trained to use emergency equipment? If you do get injured do you know where to go and what to do? Do you have any idea what your health and safety responsibilities as an employee is? Plans for Analyzing Data To make sure I get the information wanted from the questions asked ; I will need

Monday, November 25, 2019

Managers, Operations and Management

Managers, Operations and Management Free Online Research Papers Managers have many functions in an organization. Traditionally, the term management refers to the set of activities, and often the group of people, involved in four general functions, including planning, organizing, leading and coordinating activities. Organizations often have 3 levels of managers. First-line managers are responsible for day-to-day operation. They also supervise the people performing the activities required to make the good or service. Middle managers supervise first-line managers. They are also responsible to find the best way to use departmental resources to achieve goals. Top managers are responsible for the performance of all departments and have cross-departmental responsibility. They establish organizational goals and monitor middle managers (jpkc). There are four functions for managers to use to assist and ease in making decisions on goals and projects. Those functions are: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. All four functional areas are important and require attention for an organization to succeed. In regards to managing there is numerous projects that need focus and attention. Planning functional area of management is the first essential phase of the overall management process. What comes out of planning provides a need for the other functional areas of management: organizing, leading and controlling. Planning Planning is the process used by managers to identify and select appropriate goals and courses of action for an organization. Three good steps to planning are: Which goals should be pursued? How should the goal be attained? How should the resources be allocated? This function is used to determine how effective and productive the organization is and used in the strategy process of the organization. Planning, including identifying goals, objectives, methods, resources needed to carry out methods, responsibilities and dates for completion of tasks. Examples of planning are strategic planning, business planning, project planning, staffing planning, advertising and promotions planning, etc (jpkc). Planning can be described as â€Å"specifying the goals to be achieved and deciding in advance the appropriate actions needed to achieve those goals† (Bateman Snell, 2004, p. 15). Organizing Organizing is the management function of assembling and coordinating human, financial, physical, informational, and other resources needed to achieve goals. Managers will group people into departments according to the tasks performed. They will also decide the lines of authority and responsibility for members. An organizational structure is the outcome of organizing. This structure coordinates and motivates employees so that they work together to achieve goals. In their work (â€Å"Management: The New Competitive Landscape,† 2004), authors Bateman and Snell define the organizing function of management as â€Å"assembling and Coordinating the human, financial, physical, informational, and other resources needed to achieve goals† (p. 15). Organizing resources to achieve the goals in an optimum fashion. Examples are organizing new departments, human resources, office and file systems, re-organizing businesses, and billing departments. Leading Leading is the management function that involves the manager’s efforts to stimulate high performance by employees. In leading, managers decide the direction to take; state a clear vision for employees to follow, and help employees understand the role they play in attaining goals. Leadership involves a manager using power in an assertive way, influence, vision, persuasion, and communication skills. The outcome of the leading function is a high level of motivation and commitment from employees to the organization. Leadership is a management functional area that can come into play early during planning, especially when it is evident that an idea needs to be communicated, gain support for a concept, or just simply communicate the nature of a project. Leading, including setting direction for the organization, groups and individuals and also influencing people to follow that direction. Examples are establishing strategic direction, vision, values, mission and goals, and championing methods of organizational performance management to pursue that direction (jpkc). Control Managers who control are able to evaluate how well the organization is achieving its goals and takes corrective action to improve performance. They will monitor individuals, departments, and the organization to determine if desired performance has been reached. Managers will also take action to increase performance as required. The outcome of the controlling function is the accurate measurement of performance and regulation of efficiency and effectiveness. Control provides feedback by which daily activities can be directed toward achieving goals and objectives. As a manager, you receive feedback and able to make adjustments to improve productivity, identify and take corrective action, and take control when opportunities exist for growth. The manager controls the organization’s processes and structures to effectively and efficiently reaches goals and objectives. This includes ongoing collection of feedback, and monitoring and adjustment of systems, processes and structures acco rdingly. The management functional area of controlling consists of processes, procedures and indicators by which one can measure the degree of success or failure associated with an enterprise. Examples include use of financial controls, policies and procedures, performance management processes, measures to avoid risks etc. Another common view is that management is getting things done through others. Yet another view, quite apart from the traditional view, asserts that the job of management is to support employees efforts to be fully productive members of the organizations and citizens of the community. Conclusion As we enter into the new generation of management, there are new functions of management; they help to define the new reality of the workplace and the new partnership of managers and employees working together to meet common goals. They are: energize, empower, support, and communicate. Managers make things happen. They create energy instead of taking from the department and from the organization; they channel and amplify it back to the organization. Successful managers create compelling visions for their employees to strive for, and then they get out of the way. They delegate responsibility and the authority necessary to get a job done. To achieve their goals, managers depend on the skills that their employees offer them and their organizations. Increasingly, managers are becoming coaches, colleagues, and cheerleaders for the employees they support rather than prison wardens or executioners. The best managers allow their employees to make mistakes or to disagree with the status quo with no fear of retribution. Information is power and information must be communicated throughout an organization quickly and efficiently. To most employees, the term management probably means the group of people (executives and other managers) who are primarily responsible for making decisions in the organization. In a nonprofit, the term management might refer to all or any of the activities of the board, executive director and/or program directors. Whatever the term, managers use the four functions to the best of their ability to accomplish many goals. It is up to each manager to also incorporate the new functions of management to energize and empower employees, to support them and communicate all necessary information within that organization. Work Cited Bateman, T.S., Snell, S.A. (2004). Management: The new competitive landscape. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Jpkc. (2005). What is management? Retrieved November 23, 2005 from http://jpkc.szpt.edu.cn/english/supplement/Unit1/management%20functions.htm. Nelson, Bob. (2005). The new functions of management. Retrieved November 23, 2005 from bizjournals.com/bizwomen/consultants/return_on_people/2000/04/24/column 76.html. Research Papers on Managers, Operations and ManagementThe Project Managment Office SystemBionic Assembly System: A New Concept of SelfLifes What IfsInfluences of Socio-Economic Status of Married MalesPETSTEL analysis of IndiaIncorporating Risk and Uncertainty Factor in CapitalOpen Architechture a white paperThe Hockey GameRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andResearch Process Part One

Thursday, November 21, 2019

History of Modern France Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

History of Modern France - Essay Example The National Guardsmen who had mutinied and helped in the proper reorganization of the city in a manner that appreciates the interests of the workers. The origins of the Paris Commune started on March 18, 1871, after France had been defeated by Prussia in a war and the French government deployed troops into the city of Paris to take back the Parisian National Guard (PNG) before the revolting workers got hold of it. However, the citizens had hold of it and were not willing to surrender it up after which the soldiers refused to use the cannon to fire on its own citizens but instead turned it against their officers. Popkin (2013) states that after the occurrence of this act, the PNG conducted free elections whereby Parisians elected a council whose composition was the Jacobins and Republicans as well as a few socialists and anarchists which declared Paris an independent commune. The commune consisted of members who could be recalled by the voters at any time, paid average wages and was equal in terms of status to other members who were within the same commune. The Paris Commune of 1871 introduced such reforms such as turning places of work into co-operatives, which was mainly making the anarchist theory practical, which culminated, into forty-three workplaces becoming co-operatives by May of 1871. For instance, the Louvre Museum became a factory run and managed by a large worker’s council and the belief by the Mechanics Union and the Association of Metal Workers that they could only be emancipated if they formed a worker’s association (Popkin, 2013). The reform envisaged also believed that the need to abolish the exploitation of men by fellow men was through the organization of labor in associations and capital that could not be separated from the organizations. Through this, the Paris Commune would achieve equality for all the individuals concerned in the nation.